Showing posts with label lies. Show all posts
Showing posts with label lies. Show all posts

Wednesday, November 21, 2012

If you have to say it...


       In life there are many things that need to be said.  "Excuse me", to someone with no situational awareness, "I love you" to your family, "I'm not going to tell you again" has a host of uses.  The point is there are things that need saying, and things you need to say, and there is a difference.  

       "I'm mature"  is never true if you have to say it.  Likewise, if you have to tell someone how tough you are; you aren't.  If you need to remind someone of how respected you are; sorry, you aren't.  If you mention to someone how "enlightened" you are, you clearly don't understand what the word means.  

       The same holds true for spreading your personal beliefs (manure), and yes, I am fully aware that I am doing exactly that, right now.  I am referring more to folks like the evangelical atheist.  The preachy vegan, telling you how wrong it is to eat meat, or use animal products; is completely unaware that they are not convincing anyone, and that the loudest voice is least convincing.  "Christians", you know the ones, they can't pray inside, where only God can see them; are the same as the preachy vegans.  

       One of my favorite points where speech is in direct contradiction to reality has to be "You deserve happiness".  (or a new car, home loan, etc.)  No one deserves anything, unless they have committed a crime.  Almost any encouraging words we have for each other stand with one foot in "lie", and the other in "truth".  Kid Rock had the right of it:  "You get what you put in, and people get what they deserve.

       I will end by letting you know the ugliest of truths you will have to face.  When you need to post, each day, how you are thankful for something just because its November; you are not thankful.  By your need to say you are, you are screaming that you are not.

Monday, February 27, 2012

Center for Science in the Public Interest. BS called.

       On the way to work today I heard a comment from a representative from the "Center for Science in the Public Interest", say that a medium movie theater popcorn was as bad for you as "three quarter pounders with twelve pats of butter".  You know what that means kids; time to call BS on someone.

(http://caloriecount.about.com/calories-mcdonalds-quarter-pounder-cheese-i53977)
(http://citygirlbites.com/blog/archives/399)
(http://www.webmd.com/food-recipes/news/20091119/movie-theater-popcorn-a-calorie-bomb)
(http://fatsecret.com/calories-nutrition/usda/butter?portionid=29480&portionamount=1.000)
(http://www.storyofwellness.com/2011/11/03/like-eating-3-quarter-pounders-with-12-pats-of-butter/)

       So first we tally the claim.  Three Quarter Pounders = 1530 calories, 78g fat, (36g saturated), and 3570mg sodium.  Plus 12 pats of butter at: 432 calories, 48.72g fat (30.816 saturated), and 12 mg sodium.  This totals to: 1962 calories, 126.72 g fat (66.816 saturated), and 3762 mg sodium.

       Now they were comparing to the worst case they could find, but let's use their example.

Regal Cinemas medium popcorn: 1200 calories, 60 grams of saturated fat.  They don't list the sodium for that particular one but the other worst case was 1500mg.  (that was a large BTW)  Also I should point out that their numbers, as tested, were significantly higher than what was reported by Regal Cinemas.

So the popcorn is all saturated fat, so that is easily enough compared.   Let's do some math.

1962 - 1200 = 762 calories less for the popcorn.
126.72 - 60 = 66.72 less g of fat
66.816 - 60 = 6.816 less g of saturated fat and
3762 - 1500 = 2262 mg less sodium. (one metric crap-ton)

The short story is the popcorn isn't doing you any favors if you eat the whole damned tub yourself.  But it is hardly as bad as eating three quarter pounders with twelve pats of butter.  In fact, it seems they overstated their case by a whole hamburger, (510 calories), plus several shakers full of salt.

Also apparently they expected you to swallow the big shovel of fertilizer they were passing around.

Sunday, December 4, 2011

American's Elect is a scam

       American's Elect (http://www.americanselect.org) is a scam.  I had, in the past, recommended those with a dissatisfaction in either or both parties, to head to their website and check them out.  That was than.  I will state, for the record, A: that the organization I recommended is a scam that had taken me in, and B: no longer exists, as such.
       You see, in its early days it was an organization that claimed to want to represent a candidate, not a party. They claimed they would get their candidate, chosen by an online process, (should have been alarm klaxons) on the ballot in all 50 states.  They had some start up capital provided by some rich guys, but assured everyone that all of our interests are the same.  A dissatisfaction with politics as usual.
       Well there are certain rules that political parties are required to play by.  One of them is that they have to disclose funding.  Now I have seen, on both sides, how easily this is faked, but at least they are making the effort to fake it.  When American's Elect was asked to provide the sources of their funding, as required by any 527 organization, (its a class of charities or non profits) they first balked.  Then they delayed.  Then the Re-filed themselves as a 501 c(4) charity, which is not required to disclose its funding sources.  That alone legally precludes them from backing a political candidate.  But as you will see, they don't feel the rules apply to them.
       A quick search shows that they were initially funded (no such records are available for the present time, of course) by a group of hedge-fund managers.  So, rich people playing at politics.  I don't know if they got tired of trying to buy one side or the other, or if they just felt they could hijack an election, but theories abound.
       One is that they are working for the Democrats, trying to split the conservative vote.  Possible.  Rich guys, power, Possible.  Doubtful.  Another is that they are working for the Republicans trying to split the liberal vote.  Possible, youth oriented, demographics show liberal tendencies, Possible, Doubtful.  Another is that they are just trying to win an election directly for the hedge fund managers so they can directly change the tax structure in their favor.  Possible.  More likely.  Any way you slice it, it is the lowest form of rich people, claiming to be aligned with the disenfranchised poor.
       Why do I say the lowest form of rich people.  Industrialists build things and provide jobs.  Even the green movement creates hard goods and creates jobs.  Wall street, to a degree helps creation of jobs.  Hedge Funds though:

"A hedge fund is a private pool of capital actively managed by an investment adviser.[1][2] Hedge funds are only open for investment to a limited number of accredited or qualified investors who meet criteria set by regulators. These investors can be institutions, such as pension funds, university endowments and foundations, or high net worth individuals."


Further:

"Because hedge funds are not sold to the public or retail investors, their advisers have historically not been subject to the same restrictions that govern other investment fund advisers, with regard to how the fund may be structured and how strategies are employed. Hedge funds must now comply with many of the same statutory and regulatory restrictions as other institutional market participants.[8] Regulations passed in the United States and Europe after the 2008 credit crisis are intended to increase government oversight of hedge funds and eliminate any regulatory gaps.[9]"
(Ibid)

Seems we have a winner as to the motivations of this particularly sleazy group.  Recent changes to the law will regulate the back-door dealings of hedge fund managers.  We can't have that now can we?  This is not politics as usual.  This is far worse.  This is people willing to do anything, to preserve a good old boy network of legalized insider dealing, at the expense of those who can least afford it.  And they don't even feel it is worth falsifying donation records.  We are so far beneath them as to be not even worth lying to.